Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAM
slash printer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CoolHandLuke" data-source="post: 262288" data-attributes="member: 4850"><p><a href="https://powerusa.org/2012/12/27/two-companies-have-effective-100-cure/" target="_blank">https://powerusa.org/2012/12/27/two-companies-have-effective-100-cure/</a> there are cures. but cured people as you say, dont keep paying for meds.</p><p></p><p>hep c is but one example. there are cures out there for juvenile diabetes, AIDS, and some forms of cancer. we'eve even recently discovered (as a collective) how medical systems around the globe have been giving out placebos in chemo treatments, issuing watered down drugs, or just plain overcharging trying to milk cancer patients till they moo.</p><p></p><p>how can a political system make medical promises and win votes if it is a system that is already efficient and up to date? if you had a universal health care system that worked to cure people, gave timely service, and was not eating up public money what political promises could be made? what lobbying would exist? </p><p></p><p>the reality is sick people keep healthy people employed. sick people create a need for science; to give the drug giants a reason to make a slightly better pill at a slightly reduced rate while they laugh all the way to the bank. but its not just drug companies either, theres a reason many hospitals have 'cancer wards' or other ways to segregate by disease.</p><p></p><p>bottom line here is the science - not drug company science - has found the cures, but its not good politics to dole out the cure. because theres a lot of money involved and people would rather be rich than well. something something sick soul.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CoolHandLuke, post: 262288, member: 4850"] [URL]https://powerusa.org/2012/12/27/two-companies-have-effective-100-cure/[/URL] there are cures. but cured people as you say, dont keep paying for meds. hep c is but one example. there are cures out there for juvenile diabetes, AIDS, and some forms of cancer. we'eve even recently discovered (as a collective) how medical systems around the globe have been giving out placebos in chemo treatments, issuing watered down drugs, or just plain overcharging trying to milk cancer patients till they moo. how can a political system make medical promises and win votes if it is a system that is already efficient and up to date? if you had a universal health care system that worked to cure people, gave timely service, and was not eating up public money what political promises could be made? what lobbying would exist? the reality is sick people keep healthy people employed. sick people create a need for science; to give the drug giants a reason to make a slightly better pill at a slightly reduced rate while they laugh all the way to the bank. but its not just drug companies either, theres a reason many hospitals have 'cancer wards' or other ways to segregate by disease. bottom line here is the science - not drug company science - has found the cures, but its not good politics to dole out the cure. because theres a lot of money involved and people would rather be rich than well. something something sick soul. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAM
slash printer
Top
Bottom