Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Porcelain
No Prep Refractory Veneers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Toast" data-source="post: 63703" data-attributes="member: 1037"><p>Thanks guys for your insight on this case. Paul, very nice work I may wax and press some emax this weekend to compare with the refractory veneers. The whole not liking the no prep thing is just me, I guess I needed a kick in the pants to get over it. I know more patients are willing to get in the chair for no prep restorations and this Dr is one of our biggest emax accounts.</p><p>I was thinking refractory because it would give me more control in specific areas, such as masking darker areas and using mor trans porcelain in the lighter areas while keeping the veneers as thin a possible. The pt didn't want her centerals brought into alignment and didn't want the inc edge any thicker than necessary. Good point on the Use of the stumpf, refractory is definitely a guessing game to some extent. </p><p>I would not have thought to use a LT ingot in this case, probably would have used O2 and struggled with the brightness.</p><p></p><p> .1mm thickness on emax, you're the man!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Toast, post: 63703, member: 1037"] Thanks guys for your insight on this case. Paul, very nice work I may wax and press some emax this weekend to compare with the refractory veneers. The whole not liking the no prep thing is just me, I guess I needed a kick in the pants to get over it. I know more patients are willing to get in the chair for no prep restorations and this Dr is one of our biggest emax accounts. I was thinking refractory because it would give me more control in specific areas, such as masking darker areas and using mor trans porcelain in the lighter areas while keeping the veneers as thin a possible. The pt didn't want her centerals brought into alignment and didn't want the inc edge any thicker than necessary. Good point on the Use of the stumpf, refractory is definitely a guessing game to some extent. I would not have thought to use a LT ingot in this case, probably would have used O2 and struggled with the brightness. .1mm thickness on emax, you're the man! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Porcelain
No Prep Refractory Veneers
Top
Bottom