Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Community discussion
Implants
Need help identifying ancient implant from Vietnam
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="massoglia" data-source="post: 349883" data-attributes="member: 8055"><p>In a side note this has been one of the worse implant that ever got into the market, is was ment that the tiunite achive a mucointegration with the soft tissue, i never worked it greated a lot of bone lost</p><p></p><p>Van de Velde, T., Thevissen, E., Persson, G. R., Johansson, C., & De Bruyn, H. (2009). Two‐year outcome with Nobel Direct® implants: A retrospective radiographic and microbiologic study in 10 patients. <em>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</em>, <em>11</em>(3),183-193.</p><p></p><p>Conclusion: Radiographic evidence and 25% implant failures are indications of a low success rate. High counts and prevalence of significant pathogens were found at surviving implants. Although extensive bone loss had occurred in the coronal part, the apical portion of the implant showed some bone to implant integration.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="massoglia, post: 349883, member: 8055"] In a side note this has been one of the worse implant that ever got into the market, is was ment that the tiunite achive a mucointegration with the soft tissue, i never worked it greated a lot of bone lost Van de Velde, T., Thevissen, E., Persson, G. R., Johansson, C., & De Bruyn, H. (2009). Two‐year outcome with Nobel Direct® implants: A retrospective radiographic and microbiologic study in 10 patients. [I]Clinical implant dentistry and related research[/I], [I]11[/I](3),183-193. Conclusion: Radiographic evidence and 25% implant failures are indications of a low success rate. High counts and prevalence of significant pathogens were found at surviving implants. Although extensive bone loss had occurred in the coronal part, the apical portion of the implant showed some bone to implant integration. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Community discussion
Implants
Need help identifying ancient implant from Vietnam
Top
Bottom