Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Community discussion
Fixed
market share of pfms?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Affinity" data-source="post: 243298" data-attributes="member: 1246"><p>Heres the problem as I see it, then Im done talking about pfms. Drs think that zirconia was made as a replacement for PFMs (or now emax),when it was made as a replacement to Gold crowns because of high cost, low esthetics. Now they expect a FZC to have the luster and translucency of a pfm, when it just doesnt, theyre chalky. I dont care who you are or how good you are. Its only recently even come close to becoming truly esthetic, IMO. and Ive done some anterior cases in nexxzrT that scared me.. but ended up looking better than I thought. Its all about perspective.</p><p></p><p>I just did a molar crown on myself, I used nexxzr+, the Dr noticed the difference over the nexxzr T and even commented on it, but they dont necessarily want to pay more for it for posteriors.</p><p></p><p>I wont say anything bad about working for females, but its different for sure. I have 99 problems and that aint one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Affinity, post: 243298, member: 1246"] Heres the problem as I see it, then Im done talking about pfms. Drs think that zirconia was made as a replacement for PFMs (or now emax),when it was made as a replacement to Gold crowns because of high cost, low esthetics. Now they expect a FZC to have the luster and translucency of a pfm, when it just doesnt, theyre chalky. I dont care who you are or how good you are. Its only recently even come close to becoming truly esthetic, IMO. and Ive done some anterior cases in nexxzrT that scared me.. but ended up looking better than I thought. Its all about perspective. I just did a molar crown on myself, I used nexxzr+, the Dr noticed the difference over the nexxzr T and even commented on it, but they dont necessarily want to pay more for it for posteriors. I wont say anything bad about working for females, but its different for sure. I have 99 problems and that aint one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Community discussion
Fixed
market share of pfms?
Top
Bottom