Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAM
Leasing Intra-Oral Scanners
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="2thm8kr" data-source="post: 280571" data-attributes="member: 1367"><p>Very important to have a dry field. Doc should have hemostatic agents for this type of situation. Somewhere I have x rays of two different patients</p><p>who had deep decay nearly to the crest of the bone, perfect margins. They didn't want to extract and they didn't want an implant. They were prepped to the bone level</p><p>at least 6mm sub gingival. Tissue was retracted with a few cords and an IOS was taken. If you can see the margins with your eyes then the IOS can capture the data.</p><p>If not, the advantage would be squirting impression material down there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="2thm8kr, post: 280571, member: 1367"] Very important to have a dry field. Doc should have hemostatic agents for this type of situation. Somewhere I have x rays of two different patients who had deep decay nearly to the crest of the bone, perfect margins. They didn't want to extract and they didn't want an implant. They were prepped to the bone level at least 6mm sub gingival. Tissue was retracted with a few cords and an IOS was taken. If you can see the margins with your eyes then the IOS can capture the data. If not, the advantage would be squirting impression material down there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAM
Leasing Intra-Oral Scanners
Top
Bottom