Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
Is there a bad zirconia
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KingGhidorah" data-source="post: 344727" data-attributes="member: 25014"><p>Yes there is a bad zirc. </p><p></p><p>You look first at the translucency you want, most likely somewhere from 44 percent to 51 percent. Then you look at the MPA. If two products are the exact same translucency, both are multi layered for example, then the one with the higher MPA wins. I’ve seen 49 percent translucency at 630 MPA all the way to 750 MPA with the exact same parameters of shade and translucency.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KingGhidorah, post: 344727, member: 25014"] Yes there is a bad zirc. You look first at the translucency you want, most likely somewhere from 44 percent to 51 percent. Then you look at the MPA. If two products are the exact same translucency, both are multi layered for example, then the one with the higher MPA wins. I’ve seen 49 percent translucency at 630 MPA all the way to 750 MPA with the exact same parameters of shade and translucency. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
Is there a bad zirconia
Top
Bottom