Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
Is there a bad zirconia
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="npdynamite" data-source="post: 339639" data-attributes="member: 11802"><p>Interesting, I see that you are a big fan of Zirkonzahn's prettau and it is something that I've been aware of for a long time but I have never used at all. Do you find that you have great success with their products because the zirconia itself is fantastic, or do you use their pre-sintering shades and does this in your opinion make enough of a difference that it's worth going with their system?</p><p></p><p>One of things I'm curious about as I dig further into zirconia choices is whether going with a system that requires more pre-sintering work will save enough on the back end (not grinding hard materials, less firing cycles) to make spending that time up front worth it. Or if going with pre-shaded transitional pucks and trying to minimize pre-sintering work is the better way to save time and materials etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="npdynamite, post: 339639, member: 11802"] Interesting, I see that you are a big fan of Zirkonzahn's prettau and it is something that I've been aware of for a long time but I have never used at all. Do you find that you have great success with their products because the zirconia itself is fantastic, or do you use their pre-sintering shades and does this in your opinion make enough of a difference that it's worth going with their system? One of things I'm curious about as I dig further into zirconia choices is whether going with a system that requires more pre-sintering work will save enough on the back end (not grinding hard materials, less firing cycles) to make spending that time up front worth it. Or if going with pre-shaded transitional pucks and trying to minimize pre-sintering work is the better way to save time and materials etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
Is there a bad zirconia
Top
Bottom