Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Hybrids and materials to use
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JMN" data-source="post: 280256" data-attributes="member: 8469"><p>Purely my opinion. Something, somewhere needs to give. Full arch reconstruction on implants removes all<span style="font-size: 15px"> proprioceptive </span>feedback that a patient had, and aside from how sore their oral musculature becomes, and they have no idea how hard they are doing anything. And there are no current technologies to simulate periodontal ligaments to allow the average of 40-100um of movement as the teeth can do.</p><p></p><p>It's up to the team treating the patient to decide what can give. If a titanium bar with individual Emax or Zirc crowns is the solution, at least the crowns can give up and be replaced, the bone will not be replaced as easily. Maybe I'm overthinking it, but all our material science has been pointing in the harder, stronger, less flexible direction. We need to find some more flexurally-strength-increased materials that can absorb the force, instead of transmitting it.</p><p></p><p>But what do I know, I'm an uncredentialed knuckdragger.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JMN, post: 280256, member: 8469"] Purely my opinion. Something, somewhere needs to give. Full arch reconstruction on implants removes all[SIZE=4] proprioceptive [/SIZE]feedback that a patient had, and aside from how sore their oral musculature becomes, and they have no idea how hard they are doing anything. And there are no current technologies to simulate periodontal ligaments to allow the average of 40-100um of movement as the teeth can do. It's up to the team treating the patient to decide what can give. If a titanium bar with individual Emax or Zirc crowns is the solution, at least the crowns can give up and be replaced, the bone will not be replaced as easily. Maybe I'm overthinking it, but all our material science has been pointing in the harder, stronger, less flexible direction. We need to find some more flexurally-strength-increased materials that can absorb the force, instead of transmitting it. But what do I know, I'm an uncredentialed knuckdragger. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Hybrids and materials to use
Top
Bottom