Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
All Porcelain-Press
Emax Ingot Choice Poll.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Car 54" data-source="post: 196290" data-attributes="member: 85"><p>Thank you, John, I appreciate your helpful follow up post <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It sounds like the "perfect balance" (as John said, the sweetspot) of the emax ingots for doing monolithic. A little ging stain and Inc. occlusal characterizations for a ingot that has the right hue and value, sounds good. Like some of the others here have said, they just need to add more shades to the line up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Car 54, post: 196290, member: 85"] Thank you, John, I appreciate your helpful follow up post :) It sounds like the "perfect balance" (as John said, the sweetspot) of the emax ingots for doing monolithic. A little ging stain and Inc. occlusal characterizations for a ingot that has the right hue and value, sounds good. Like some of the others here have said, they just need to add more shades to the line up. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
All Porcelain-Press
Emax Ingot Choice Poll.
Top
Bottom