Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Community discussion
Implants
Digital Surgical Guide
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheLabGuy" data-source="post: 290768" data-attributes="member: 126"><p>No, there was no exact implant position...and to be honest, without a .dicom file to import with (which you can with BSB) its a total educated guess at best. I've spoken with a few Surgeons who place implants with surgical templates/guides and they tell me, unless it's a bone anchor type of surgical guide, then we just use the guide for pilot hole placement. As digital becomes more mainstream, I think we will start seeing those .dicom files come in with requests for surgical guides...or maybe the Docs will start printing them in-office. Either way, it was kinda cool to do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheLabGuy, post: 290768, member: 126"] No, there was no exact implant position...and to be honest, without a .dicom file to import with (which you can with BSB) its a total educated guess at best. I've spoken with a few Surgeons who place implants with surgical templates/guides and they tell me, unless it's a bone anchor type of surgical guide, then we just use the guide for pilot hole placement. As digital becomes more mainstream, I think we will start seeing those .dicom files come in with requests for surgical guides...or maybe the Docs will start printing them in-office. Either way, it was kinda cool to do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Community discussion
Implants
Digital Surgical Guide
Top
Bottom