Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
difference in accuracy (scanners)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="e...w...h" data-source="post: 41904" data-attributes="member: 4354"><p>Interestingly, we do large span bridges all the time and they drop right into place. NO issues there either. I think a bigger fit factor for large span bridges is oven warpage (although, there are ways to combat this as well).</p><p></p><p>Sorry guys, it's not about laughing at the science, it's about visually seeing things fit perfectly with both scanners. </p><p></p><p>I'll say it again, there comes a point of diminishing returns and I think 3shape has found a good balance between file size and efficiency gain.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="e...w...h, post: 41904, member: 4354"] Interestingly, we do large span bridges all the time and they drop right into place. NO issues there either. I think a bigger fit factor for large span bridges is oven warpage (although, there are ways to combat this as well). Sorry guys, it's not about laughing at the science, it's about visually seeing things fit perfectly with both scanners. I'll say it again, there comes a point of diminishing returns and I think 3shape has found a good balance between file size and efficiency gain. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
difference in accuracy (scanners)
Top
Bottom