Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Designing a Restoration: Free and Open Source
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="patmo141" data-source="post: 38472" data-attributes="member: 2560"><p>mrcadcam, thanks so much for your interest and support.</p><p></p><p>"hot key nightmare" indeed. One of the best things they have done was the new space-bar search menu. I also need to take the time to embed some of the functions in my menus to replace keyboard strokes with mouse clicks. I would be happy to have another collaborator!</p><p></p><p>Re: Open source. Lot's of people have asked me about the "direction" I'm planning on taking this. The way I see it, </p><p></p><p>1. I don't have time to monetize this project as a proper business venture.</p><p>2. The market is saturated with competitors</p><p>3. Keeping it open will allow other people to make changes for their personal needs.</p><p>4. I know many don't feel this way, but once I sell something, I feel an obligation to maintain its quality. So, w/o testing and a whole lot more work, I wouldn't feel comfortable selling something with the implication that it is fit for a particular use.</p><p>5. It's a hobby and if I go and try and make it a business, I've turned play into work...and that's no fun.</p><p>6.free and open is driving much of the progress at the moment. While I think my personal work is more than 90% of the overall project, it wouldn't exist without that other %10.</p><p></p><p></p><p>On the other hand, Open Source and Free are not technically synonymous. There is a lot of free software that is not open source and the other way around. In the future, I would be totally open to the concept of "selling" it for a small fee, but it would still be open source (meaning you can change it, take pieces of it for your own use, even redistribute it under the right context). I think it will be free as long as my free time allows it and I continue to enjoy it as a hobby (reserve right to change my mind <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />). It would be nice to set up an optional "pay what you think it's worth to you" to maybe fund the supply of coffee needed to maintain a high quality project. Also, once I sell something, I no longer have collaborators, I have customers and/or employees and that changes the whole dynamic.</p><p></p><p></p><p>-Patrick</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="patmo141, post: 38472, member: 2560"] mrcadcam, thanks so much for your interest and support. "hot key nightmare" indeed. One of the best things they have done was the new space-bar search menu. I also need to take the time to embed some of the functions in my menus to replace keyboard strokes with mouse clicks. I would be happy to have another collaborator! Re: Open source. Lot's of people have asked me about the "direction" I'm planning on taking this. The way I see it, 1. I don't have time to monetize this project as a proper business venture. 2. The market is saturated with competitors 3. Keeping it open will allow other people to make changes for their personal needs. 4. I know many don't feel this way, but once I sell something, I feel an obligation to maintain its quality. So, w/o testing and a whole lot more work, I wouldn't feel comfortable selling something with the implication that it is fit for a particular use. 5. It's a hobby and if I go and try and make it a business, I've turned play into work...and that's no fun. 6.free and open is driving much of the progress at the moment. While I think my personal work is more than 90% of the overall project, it wouldn't exist without that other %10. On the other hand, Open Source and Free are not technically synonymous. There is a lot of free software that is not open source and the other way around. In the future, I would be totally open to the concept of "selling" it for a small fee, but it would still be open source (meaning you can change it, take pieces of it for your own use, even redistribute it under the right context). I think it will be free as long as my free time allows it and I continue to enjoy it as a hobby (reserve right to change my mind :D). It would be nice to set up an optional "pay what you think it's worth to you" to maybe fund the supply of coffee needed to maintain a high quality project. Also, once I sell something, I no longer have collaborators, I have customers and/or employees and that changes the whole dynamic. -Patrick [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Designing a Restoration: Free and Open Source
Top
Bottom