Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Dental I/O scan workflows
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gru" data-source="post: 305338" data-attributes="member: 7032"><p>Let me clarify my question of "loss". When a Cerec scan is designed in Cerec and sent straight to the mill, it appears under a 10x microscope to be superior to the same file sent to inLab and produced. </p><p></p><p>Further, take a Medit scan by a scan only lab, and send to another Exo system to design and mill. I know for certain the parameters need to be adjusted to make the restoration fit the original model, while a scan in house and produced on the same system has a different fit.</p><p></p><p>Does all translation degrade quality?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gru, post: 305338, member: 7032"] Let me clarify my question of "loss". When a Cerec scan is designed in Cerec and sent straight to the mill, it appears under a 10x microscope to be superior to the same file sent to inLab and produced. Further, take a Medit scan by a scan only lab, and send to another Exo system to design and mill. I know for certain the parameters need to be adjusted to make the restoration fit the original model, while a scan in house and produced on the same system has a different fit. Does all translation degrade quality? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Dental I/O scan workflows
Top
Bottom