Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
Death by Zr
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NicelyMKV" data-source="post: 41518" data-attributes="member: 476"><p>I quit doing layered Zr a few years ago. Not because of failures but due to all the attacks on the material from reputable sources. I am not saying it does not work I would just rather hold off and make sure before I send anymore to my accounts. They trust me to do what is best for them and the patient as far as materials go. The only problem now is Bruxzir. I am not excited about it and have voiced the same concerns regarding opposing dentition etc but a few of my accounts are absolutely demanding it( I know contridicting myself about the trust thing). the problem is I get some posterior cases where they literally prepped 6 tenths off the tooth. Ridiculous I know but</p><p>13,000 per month account and I have had similar and growing</p><p>Issues across the boards. Bruxzir seems to be the quick and easy fix. Not saying it's the right thing to do but..... I have some pics of a posterior crown where the ceramic is already under manufacturers recommendations and still opaque and over contoured compared to a Bruxzir on the same case. Completely different</p><p>End result. Bruxzir wins hands down. I do not sell them cheap either. Pain to make them look decent. I have seen older maxillary anterior work with smooth linguals that had totally wiped out the mandibular anteriors. That was slick? So is it because the older ceramic was more hard? Like Zr? Just curious.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NicelyMKV, post: 41518, member: 476"] I quit doing layered Zr a few years ago. Not because of failures but due to all the attacks on the material from reputable sources. I am not saying it does not work I would just rather hold off and make sure before I send anymore to my accounts. They trust me to do what is best for them and the patient as far as materials go. The only problem now is Bruxzir. I am not excited about it and have voiced the same concerns regarding opposing dentition etc but a few of my accounts are absolutely demanding it( I know contridicting myself about the trust thing). the problem is I get some posterior cases where they literally prepped 6 tenths off the tooth. Ridiculous I know but 13,000 per month account and I have had similar and growing Issues across the boards. Bruxzir seems to be the quick and easy fix. Not saying it's the right thing to do but..... I have some pics of a posterior crown where the ceramic is already under manufacturers recommendations and still opaque and over contoured compared to a Bruxzir on the same case. Completely different End result. Bruxzir wins hands down. I do not sell them cheap either. Pain to make them look decent. I have seen older maxillary anterior work with smooth linguals that had totally wiped out the mandibular anteriors. That was slick? So is it because the older ceramic was more hard? Like Zr? Just curious. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
Death by Zr
Top
Bottom