Cool Roland (51d) tool I'd like to share

K

karlanm

Member
Full Member
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I know the Roland DWX-51 isn't the most common mill anymore, but here is a tool and gcode I created a while back

Had something I was experimenting with and needed to remove pucks and place them back exactly in the same spot (using the C clamp). Been able to get .05-.1mm precision using this, which is pretty darn surprising, and probably not repeatable 100% of the time, however this could be useful to get every smidge of space out of pucks without worrying about alignment.

If you are clever you can come up with other uses for this........

Attached as 7zip file is the gcode for milling the alignment holes using a 3mm acrylic endmill and the STLS to print the alignment tool in FDM printers for 20,25,&30mm puck sizes.

Disclamer, use gcode at your own risk, and obviously with right puck size.




IMG_20240509_132220177~2.jpg
IMG_20240509_132159595~2.jpg
 
T

tuyere

Active Member
Full Member
Messages
416
Solutions
2
Reaction score
0
Neat, always nice to see people's homebrewed solutions to thorny issues.
 
K

karlanm

Member
Full Member
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
would love to know what other uses you may have
If you are good with the post processor or fusion 360. You can do multi-material... however, dental applications aren't allowed due to patents. Allegedly.
 
K

karlanm

Member
Full Member
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Here is the gcode setup in vcarve for 25mm puck if anyone ever wants to do artsy stuff. Also if you were ever curious about the coordinate system on these machines. You can use a header and footer from hyperdent/millbox nc/prn file.


Screenshot 2024-01-01 142305.png
 
CoolHandLuke

CoolHandLuke

Idiot
Full Member
Messages
10,106
Solutions
1
Reaction score
1,411
how do you mean Multi Material?
 
K

karlanm

Member
Full Member
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
how do you mean Multi Material?
idea which I think isn't covered by a patent would be to mill the female side of a hybrid (with reduced gingiva) and a, oversized in Z direction, a trilor male piece you cement in. Apply pink composite. Then remill as a monolithic (designed without bar) giving you a multi material hybrid milled as one unit. Ready to have sprues cut off, polished and ti bases cemented in and out the door.

This requires placing everything in the same coordinate space and substituting them out and doing boolean cuts with expanded meshes as finish lines for things like gingiva/enamel junctions in a program like meshmixer or blender. Also modifying the gcode and maybe having template generator to make sure the gcode doesn't try to mill anything the opposite side of the A axis would have milled (but was not milled)

Don't take my word for it, and not sure if this would save anytime. But that will give you an idea, but its not what I've used this for.
 
CoolHandLuke

CoolHandLuke

Idiot
Full Member
Messages
10,106
Solutions
1
Reaction score
1,411
sounds like a lot of unnecessary work
 
K

karlanm

Member
Full Member
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
sounds like a lot of unnecessary work
I agree, but since they aren't making many new techs anymore; I wouldn't be surprised if the whole industry turns into one large Rube Goldberg machine.
 
RileyS

RileyS

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
2,877
Reaction score
461
I don’t think I fully understand Would making marks on the holder and marking the disc do the exact same thing?
IMG_8157.jpeg
 
RileyS

RileyS

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
2,877
Reaction score
461
Tried opening the link but my computer doesn't seem to want to...?
 
K

karlanm

Member
Full Member
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I don’t think I fully understand Would making marks on the holder and marking the disc do the exact same thing?
Yea, the puckholders/cassettes accomplish this without the need alignment holes. The C clamps, at least on 51d, require removing the puck entirely.

If you wanted this to work for a cassette (for example, to avoid buying more),you could modify the STL to match the geometry of those little divots on the silver metal piece on the outside. Also, I think the indexing holes are 1.5 mm deep in the puck, so it may not be the best solution if that is too much.
 
Last edited:
K

karlanm

Member
Full Member
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Tried opening the link but my computer doesn't seem to want to...?
Chrome for me blocks it because its not https, if you copy it into the url and choose keep it'll download. I zipped it with 7zip because it's 1.5mb vs 5mb for zip and thought it would attach here
 
T

tuyere

Active Member
Full Member
Messages
416
Solutions
2
Reaction score
0
fwiw I know we've occasionally roughed out denture teeth + base, cemented them together, and then did the finishing passes on the combined parts simultaneously. gives better results than doing it all separately and then cementing.
 
K

karlanm

Member
Full Member
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
fwiw I know we've occasionally roughed out denture teeth + base, cemented them together, and then did the finishing passes on the combined parts simultaneously. gives better results than doing it all separately and then cementing.

Yep, you can use the "exchangepart" command in hyperdent for this, and export the stls directly from exocad so they are aligned correctly in 3d space
 
M

MrNeverFixit

Active Member
Full Member
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
I don’t think I fully understand Would making marks on the holder and marking the disc do the exact same thing?
View attachment 44711
This is how i do it on my 52d. I mark the notch on the regular adapter with a marker and then align the mark on the c-clamp notch. See picture. No need of extra tools…just a marker pen which is simple and easy…

If i take it out from a regular adapter and had to put in back on it again. I mark it on the second picture with a sharpie pen with the fine tip.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2041.jpeg
    IMG_2041.jpeg
    352 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_2042.jpeg
    IMG_2042.jpeg
    74.2 KB · Views: 9
Top Bottom