Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Community discussion
Implants
Compromised case
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JMN" data-source="post: 248530" data-attributes="member: 8469"><p>I was thinking that combining 2 natural teeth, one on either side, would be okay. A natural abutment on one side of a bridge with an impant as the other abutment would certainly increase chances for super-erupting the tooth as the tooth can shift up to 80-150 microns under force, but the implant cannot.</p><p>I conceed the very valid concern, but with the implant as the fulcrum point, my thought was the super-eruptive forces would ballance out. But you are right that it is a chance, not a certainty.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JMN, post: 248530, member: 8469"] I was thinking that combining 2 natural teeth, one on either side, would be okay. A natural abutment on one side of a bridge with an impant as the other abutment would certainly increase chances for super-erupting the tooth as the tooth can shift up to 80-150 microns under force, but the implant cannot. I conceed the very valid concern, but with the implant as the fulcrum point, my thought was the super-eruptive forces would ballance out. But you are right that it is a chance, not a certainty. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Community discussion
Implants
Compromised case
Top
Bottom