Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Community discussion
Case Presentations
Case Presentation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dentalmike" data-source="post: 188887" data-attributes="member: 7589"><p>Still keeping it metal for bridges for small connectors. All centric areas were .3 to .5. Are y'all doing zirc this thin for centric areas? I also thought zirc would need to have thin facial layering only, for decent connector size and I wanted lots of room for layering. Was considering zirc until they said splint the premolar and connector was so small and thin that for me, metal for sure.</p><p></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]19541[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]19542[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]19543[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]19544[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]19545[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dentalmike, post: 188887, member: 7589"] Still keeping it metal for bridges for small connectors. All centric areas were .3 to .5. Are y'all doing zirc this thin for centric areas? I also thought zirc would need to have thin facial layering only, for decent connector size and I wanted lots of room for layering. Was considering zirc until they said splint the premolar and connector was so small and thin that for me, metal for sure. [ATTACH=full]19541[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]19542[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]19543[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]19544[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]19545[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Community discussion
Case Presentations
Case Presentation
Top
Bottom