Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Can intraoral scanners scan impressions better than desktop scanners + other qs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="2thm8kr" data-source="post: 302510" data-attributes="member: 1367"><p>Some had arch discrepancies. Some were not able to get a complete scan of the arch height due to focal length. Undercuts were a problem with mist of them. If I had a stone model to merge I would just scan that with desktop scanner and be done.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="2thm8kr, post: 302510, member: 1367"] Some had arch discrepancies. Some were not able to get a complete scan of the arch height due to focal length. Undercuts were a problem with mist of them. If I had a stone model to merge I would just scan that with desktop scanner and be done. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Can intraoral scanners scan impressions better than desktop scanners + other qs
Top
Bottom