Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
Anterior Zirconia Monolithic
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JohnWilson" data-source="post: 214149" data-attributes="member: 213"><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000">Read the instructions that come with the disk, if you are outsourcing ask for them to send you the instructions for the material you are doing.</span> </strong><span style="color: #ff0080">DON'T TRUST, KNOW!</span></p><p></p><p>There is not a zirconia on this planet that is stating .45 that I have run across in HS. As for HT cubic style anterior it would be an even higher gamble.</p><p></p><p>Ever notice how some milling centers want you to use their DME for their materials. Ever notice how some material files have a much thicker margin line offset and cementa spacer? </p><p></p><p>The milling centers are in business to make money. The could care flipping less about your struggles with layering. They want it to fit and not come back. If they are stating something that will be problematic its silly for both parties as I see it.</p><p></p><p>My dimensions for EVERYTHING I do does not go inside of MFG recommendation. </p><p></p><p>Can I mill an absolute perfectly prepped rounded internal line angle prep and mill it to .45 and feel good about it in ZENO , yeah no problem but at that thickness I can not guarantee it will not have an issue down the line. I like to limit the things I can not control and if I am asked to do something inside spec I say no guarantee and document everything.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JohnWilson, post: 214149, member: 213"] [B][COLOR=#ff0000]Read the instructions that come with the disk, if you are outsourcing ask for them to send you the instructions for the material you are doing.[/COLOR] [/B][COLOR=#ff0080]DON'T TRUST, KNOW![/COLOR] There is not a zirconia on this planet that is stating .45 that I have run across in HS. As for HT cubic style anterior it would be an even higher gamble. Ever notice how some milling centers want you to use their DME for their materials. Ever notice how some material files have a much thicker margin line offset and cementa spacer? The milling centers are in business to make money. The could care flipping less about your struggles with layering. They want it to fit and not come back. If they are stating something that will be problematic its silly for both parties as I see it. My dimensions for EVERYTHING I do does not go inside of MFG recommendation. Can I mill an absolute perfectly prepped rounded internal line angle prep and mill it to .45 and feel good about it in ZENO , yeah no problem but at that thickness I can not guarantee it will not have an issue down the line. I like to limit the things I can not control and if I am asked to do something inside spec I say no guarantee and document everything. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
Anterior Zirconia Monolithic
Top
Bottom