Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
All on X in house milling issues , scan marker accuracy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stefan" data-source="post: 333923" data-attributes="member: 13086"><p>Hi guys, got a new metal milling machine for my all on X cases and of course as every new thing first attempts were not a success. I receive inaccuracies (not a passive fit) on my first long span implant restorations and convinced I mess up something with the marker scanning as cement retained cases are coming perfect. I use OpenTechnologies Deluxe scanner and Medit SE, 5 axis Yenadent mill with 2,7kW IMT spindle ,250W servos and Mayka CAM. I have no experience milling implant connections till now I used VHF to mill zirkonia and emax mainly, so any suggestions would be helpful. Basically I did 3 times one all on 4 case, first time scanned with the Deluxe scanner, scan markers on 2 stages and scanning software merged everything. Second time again with Deluxe but scanned all markers together and merged data in Exocad. Third time used the old Medit SE , again all markers together and merged data in Exocad. Unfortunately nothing fitted perfectly, there was always one bar pillar not fitting (not on the same implant). Believe it or not best result was with the old Medit scanner, inaccuracy was lets say 50-100 micron in the middle implant , rest fitted perfect. I assume scanning of the markers is the issue, as did few smaller implant bridges and were fitting perfect . As I mentioned have zero experience with long span implant restoration scanning and manufacturing , but the scan markers scans does not seem smooth enough . I tried using nano scan gel , but mesh doesn't seem good as when you scan plaster for example. Would appreciate any advice, thank you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stefan, post: 333923, member: 13086"] Hi guys, got a new metal milling machine for my all on X cases and of course as every new thing first attempts were not a success. I receive inaccuracies (not a passive fit) on my first long span implant restorations and convinced I mess up something with the marker scanning as cement retained cases are coming perfect. I use OpenTechnologies Deluxe scanner and Medit SE, 5 axis Yenadent mill with 2,7kW IMT spindle ,250W servos and Mayka CAM. I have no experience milling implant connections till now I used VHF to mill zirkonia and emax mainly, so any suggestions would be helpful. Basically I did 3 times one all on 4 case, first time scanned with the Deluxe scanner, scan markers on 2 stages and scanning software merged everything. Second time again with Deluxe but scanned all markers together and merged data in Exocad. Third time used the old Medit SE , again all markers together and merged data in Exocad. Unfortunately nothing fitted perfectly, there was always one bar pillar not fitting (not on the same implant). Believe it or not best result was with the old Medit scanner, inaccuracy was lets say 50-100 micron in the middle implant , rest fitted perfect. I assume scanning of the markers is the issue, as did few smaller implant bridges and were fitting perfect . As I mentioned have zero experience with long span implant restoration scanning and manufacturing , but the scan markers scans does not seem smooth enough . I tried using nano scan gel , but mesh doesn't seem good as when you scan plaster for example. Would appreciate any advice, thank you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
All on X in house milling issues , scan marker accuracy
Top
Bottom