Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
3 Shape vs InLab
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ATXtech" data-source="post: 339204" data-attributes="member: 25330"><p>If anyone has any opinions on which might be a better system to purchase, 3Shape vs Inlab, and why, I would really appreciate it. </p><p>I currently use ZirkonZahn but its hard to train people on that and it doesn't, currently, nest and mill angled abutments very well. And we would have to upgrade to the 9000 series software to make models for printing soft tissue separately.</p><p>We just want to have an extra design station with another software to save designs and send to our ZirkonZahn nesting and mill on a ZirkonZahn M1 Milling unit.</p><p> We're currently looking for something </p><p>- Easier to train with than ZirkonZahn</p><p>- Is good for productivity, (It would be good to know which system is faster)</p><p>-If possible, do either do a good job of saving a design for a screw retained implant crown with and angled abutment, that allows the mill to mill accurately and prevent a tight fit with the base. (I understand this just might just be a nesting issue with ZirkonZahn)</p><p>- Designs implant models with a separate soft tissue</p><p>- Is better for accuracy with margins and contacts</p><p>And we are open to any thoughts and opinions on pros and cons, etc between the 2 systems.</p><p>---THANK YOU---</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ATXtech, post: 339204, member: 25330"] If anyone has any opinions on which might be a better system to purchase, 3Shape vs Inlab, and why, I would really appreciate it. I currently use ZirkonZahn but its hard to train people on that and it doesn't, currently, nest and mill angled abutments very well. And we would have to upgrade to the 9000 series software to make models for printing soft tissue separately. We just want to have an extra design station with another software to save designs and send to our ZirkonZahn nesting and mill on a ZirkonZahn M1 Milling unit. We're currently looking for something - Easier to train with than ZirkonZahn - Is good for productivity, (It would be good to know which system is faster) -If possible, do either do a good job of saving a design for a screw retained implant crown with and angled abutment, that allows the mill to mill accurately and prevent a tight fit with the base. (I understand this just might just be a nesting issue with ZirkonZahn) - Designs implant models with a separate soft tissue - Is better for accuracy with margins and contacts And we are open to any thoughts and opinions on pros and cons, etc between the 2 systems. ---THANK YOU--- [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
3 Shape vs InLab
Top
Bottom