Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
Your best monolithic result...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ecltam" data-source="post: 264124" data-attributes="member: 19048"><p>Hi all, </p><p>Slight change of topics. We had been using Katana, Sagemaxx, AG's Zolid FX... and the esthetic result is great!</p><p>However, will someone share if you have problems with zirconia crowns becoming oversized after sintering despite following all manufacturers' instructions?</p><p>We are using different brands of zirconia on an Amann Girrback Motion 2 milling machine with their new round 98mm holder, but even with their own Zolid FX zirconia, the crowns are also slightly bigger, especially at the occlusal aspect.</p><p></p><p>Thanks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ecltam, post: 264124, member: 19048"] Hi all, Slight change of topics. We had been using Katana, Sagemaxx, AG's Zolid FX... and the esthetic result is great! However, will someone share if you have problems with zirconia crowns becoming oversized after sintering despite following all manufacturers' instructions? We are using different brands of zirconia on an Amann Girrback Motion 2 milling machine with their new round 98mm holder, but even with their own Zolid FX zirconia, the crowns are also slightly bigger, especially at the occlusal aspect. Thanks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
Your best monolithic result...
Top
Bottom