Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
Team JENSEN players
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CAD BANE" data-source="post: 161048" data-attributes="member: 12192"><p>Can I ask where the reviews are coming from on the Small Dekema (Dekema 664)? From what I understand not too many people have them.</p><p>Fortunately for me, and you, I am one of the few that has been using it on a daily basis and my Zirconia has never looked so good. As I have stated in my previous post I have worked with a lot of different sintering furnaces. The Dekema 664 is the first sintering furnace that gets me jazzed about what I am seeing in my zirconia. Since it is a smaller unit (about the size of a pressing furnace) it's capcity is not as big as other furnaces. If you plan on sintering more than 80+ units a day then it may not be a good choice. Otherwise I think its a great choice especially if you want your zirconia sintered in an optimal enviornment. It does have a friendly price tag as well, bonus!</p><p></p><p>Highest quality silicon carbide heating elements providing consistent temperatures and ensuring a long life of the elements.</p><p></p><p>No discoloration or contamination due to the quality silicon carbide heating elements</p><p></p><p>Patent Pending Thermocouple Design providing a consistent sintering environment and helping produce predictable results</p><p></p><p>Plug and Play functionality. Out of the box and sintering.</p><p></p><p>Compact design optimizes space in the lab (383 mm x 780 mm x 343 mm width x height x depth)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CAD BANE, post: 161048, member: 12192"] Can I ask where the reviews are coming from on the Small Dekema (Dekema 664)? From what I understand not too many people have them. Fortunately for me, and you, I am one of the few that has been using it on a daily basis and my Zirconia has never looked so good. As I have stated in my previous post I have worked with a lot of different sintering furnaces. The Dekema 664 is the first sintering furnace that gets me jazzed about what I am seeing in my zirconia. Since it is a smaller unit (about the size of a pressing furnace) it's capcity is not as big as other furnaces. If you plan on sintering more than 80+ units a day then it may not be a good choice. Otherwise I think its a great choice especially if you want your zirconia sintered in an optimal enviornment. It does have a friendly price tag as well, bonus! Highest quality silicon carbide heating elements providing consistent temperatures and ensuring a long life of the elements. No discoloration or contamination due to the quality silicon carbide heating elements Patent Pending Thermocouple Design providing a consistent sintering environment and helping produce predictable results Plug and Play functionality. Out of the box and sintering. Compact design optimizes space in the lab (383 mm x 780 mm x 343 mm width x height x depth) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
Team JENSEN players
Top
Bottom