Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Roland DWX-30 vs. Wieland Mini.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BobCDT" data-source="post: 61160" data-attributes="member: 3119"><p>Hi,*</p><p></p><p>I have never worked with the Origin 500 so I really can't provide a viable comparative analysis. However, I do know the guys at Origin and like them a lot. *They can usually customize milling strategies for you depending on what your needs are, so I'd recommend asking them.</p><p></p><p>We have created our own milling strategies with the Sum3D CAM that we use for our Roland mills. We are a Sum 3D reseller. *We would definitely provide the mill strategy for the restoration shown to any new (or past) SUM 3D customer of ours. I would recommend the Roland for a first mill if your intention is to fill it with zirconia, wax and PMMA. However, if you want to mill metals you should look elsewhere. *The Roland is very easy to use and will produce restorations like the photo i posted in this thread. There is no magic to it, no genius CAM person required. *If you (or someone in your lab can do CAD) the CAM and mill part will be simple. Obviously, *to get results like the pics posted your design would require similar detail.</p><p></p><p>For more info you can go to our website.</p><p><a href="http://www.cap-us.com" target="_blank">CAP Incorporated: Custom Automated Prosthetics, Dental Implant Abutments, Lava Zirconia Frameworks, Outsource Abutment</a></p><p></p><p>Bob</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BobCDT, post: 61160, member: 3119"] Hi,* I have never worked with the Origin 500 so I really can't provide a viable comparative analysis. However, I do know the guys at Origin and like them a lot. *They can usually customize milling strategies for you depending on what your needs are, so I'd recommend asking them. We have created our own milling strategies with the Sum3D CAM that we use for our Roland mills. We are a Sum 3D reseller. *We would definitely provide the mill strategy for the restoration shown to any new (or past) SUM 3D customer of ours. I would recommend the Roland for a first mill if your intention is to fill it with zirconia, wax and PMMA. However, if you want to mill metals you should look elsewhere. *The Roland is very easy to use and will produce restorations like the photo i posted in this thread. There is no magic to it, no genius CAM person required. *If you (or someone in your lab can do CAD) the CAM and mill part will be simple. Obviously, *to get results like the pics posted your design would require similar detail. For more info you can go to our website. [url=http://www.cap-us.com]CAP Incorporated: Custom Automated Prosthetics, Dental Implant Abutments, Lava Zirconia Frameworks, Outsource Abutment[/url] Bob [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Roland DWX-30 vs. Wieland Mini.
Top
Bottom