Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Porcelain
Porcelain Vs. Zirconium + post material - Discoloration & Aesthetics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rkm rdt" data-source="post: 48464" data-attributes="member: 83"><p>My first choice would be Emax because I can achieve good translucency.I can even cover a metal post and core as long as the post has been opaqued to the tooth shade.</p><p></p><p>My second choice would be porcelain fused to zirconia crowns for basically the same reasons.</p><p></p><p>My third choice would be porcelain fused to metal crowns.</p><p></p><p>Sometimes a patient's occlusion dictates material choice as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rkm rdt, post: 48464, member: 83"] My first choice would be Emax because I can achieve good translucency.I can even cover a metal post and core as long as the post has been opaqued to the tooth shade. My second choice would be porcelain fused to zirconia crowns for basically the same reasons. My third choice would be porcelain fused to metal crowns. Sometimes a patient's occlusion dictates material choice as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Porcelain
Porcelain Vs. Zirconium + post material - Discoloration & Aesthetics
Top
Bottom