Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
My new, new scanner....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Affinity" data-source="post: 95736" data-attributes="member: 1246"><p>What percent of Drs in the US give a crap about microscopic accuracy anyway. In europe many Drs use intraoral scopes.. But i dont know of any in the US. Maybe endo docs. If it fits passive and screws down, what is the problem? Were not covering tooth structure. Is the FDA going to stick their micro-eyes in every pts mouth? </p><p></p><p>Im not sure if anyone has noticed but implant docs arent the most accurate..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Affinity, post: 95736, member: 1246"] What percent of Drs in the US give a crap about microscopic accuracy anyway. In europe many Drs use intraoral scopes.. But i dont know of any in the US. Maybe endo docs. If it fits passive and screws down, what is the problem? Were not covering tooth structure. Is the FDA going to stick their micro-eyes in every pts mouth? Im not sure if anyone has noticed but implant docs arent the most accurate.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
My new, new scanner....
Top
Bottom