Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
All Porcelain-Press
My Monolithic LT looks like FCZ
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="desertfox384" data-source="post: 150560" data-attributes="member: 1501"><p>Value ingots are good for posterior's in the light shade range with a light stump. They lie in between LT and HT in translucency. I did HT's for a few years on my posterior cases but ultimately decided they came out too gray. So I went to LT and Value ingots mostly, unless its an onlay or something replacing enamel, then I will use HT. Only drawback with the value's is that they are a "generic" shade.. You may find a little more learning curve staining those to the correct shade than an LT.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="desertfox384, post: 150560, member: 1501"] Value ingots are good for posterior's in the light shade range with a light stump. They lie in between LT and HT in translucency. I did HT's for a few years on my posterior cases but ultimately decided they came out too gray. So I went to LT and Value ingots mostly, unless its an onlay or something replacing enamel, then I will use HT. Only drawback with the value's is that they are a "generic" shade.. You may find a little more learning curve staining those to the correct shade than an LT. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
All Porcelain-Press
My Monolithic LT looks like FCZ
Top
Bottom