Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Porcelain
Ivoclar Style
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Contraluz" data-source="post: 244103" data-attributes="member: 3357"><p>And that is the issue...</p><p></p><p>I agree, it seems silly to put a new porcelain system on the market. But, there are plenty of regions, al over the world, where a usual restoration is a NP pfm (Co-Cr etc...) If you reuse the metal, costs os a coping are very low...</p><p></p><p>Outsourcing to a milling center may not work either, since the cost of shipping can outweigh the cost of the restoration. </p><p></p><p>I don't know if IPS Style will work out for Ivoclar, Especially since they have three (3) pfm systems on the market, already.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Contraluz, post: 244103, member: 3357"] And that is the issue... I agree, it seems silly to put a new porcelain system on the market. But, there are plenty of regions, al over the world, where a usual restoration is a NP pfm (Co-Cr etc...) If you reuse the metal, costs os a coping are very low... Outsourcing to a milling center may not work either, since the cost of shipping can outweigh the cost of the restoration. I don't know if IPS Style will work out for Ivoclar, Especially since they have three (3) pfm systems on the market, already. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Porcelain
Ivoclar Style
Top
Bottom