Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Equipment
Dekema µSiC vs. Zirkonofen 700 ultra-vakum
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Prosthodontics" data-source="post: 170068" data-attributes="member: 7077"><p>In the market for a Zr sintering furnace. Would prefer furnace to have sufficient volume to hold at least 2 full-arch Zirconia bridges. Happy not to have ultra-fast cycles. </p><p></p><p>Any reviews of either of the above? Zirkonofen seems more versatile, will the Dekema give same results as Zirkonofen with anterior prettau?</p><p></p><p>Any known issues with ZirkonZahn furnaces?</p><p></p><p>Thanks in advance for the help.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Prosthodontics, post: 170068, member: 7077"] In the market for a Zr sintering furnace. Would prefer furnace to have sufficient volume to hold at least 2 full-arch Zirconia bridges. Happy not to have ultra-fast cycles. Any reviews of either of the above? Zirkonofen seems more versatile, will the Dekema give same results as Zirkonofen with anterior prettau? Any known issues with ZirkonZahn furnaces? Thanks in advance for the help. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Equipment
Dekema µSiC vs. Zirkonofen 700 ultra-vakum
Top
Bottom