Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Anyone Milling Emax/Origin machine
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jamie newlands" data-source="post: 30520" data-attributes="member: 3136"><p>Hi Mark,</p><p></p><p>I have had cerec since 2006. At present we do over 1300 units per year with a view to moving that up to around 2500, over the next 12 months. I have worked with some top lab techs and had the privelege of working with and lecturing for dentsply, sirona, ivoclar, 3m over the last years. Cad Cam is my passion within dentistry and whilst I understand your viewpoint I guess it depends what the job is. For our needs we place a lot of single visit restorations. As a consequence cerec / inlab is the only tool for the job within my particular situation. </p><p></p><p>Going forwards we recently employed a CDT to work in house for bridgework production. The ability to stack mill and then mill superstructures in emax has enabled one lab tech (of 16 years experience) produce more units than he could with 4 staff historically. Whilst I realise this model may not work in all commercial lab situations for our own needs it is working well.</p><p></p><p>Hope this helps.</p><p></p><p>j</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jamie newlands, post: 30520, member: 3136"] Hi Mark, I have had cerec since 2006. At present we do over 1300 units per year with a view to moving that up to around 2500, over the next 12 months. I have worked with some top lab techs and had the privelege of working with and lecturing for dentsply, sirona, ivoclar, 3m over the last years. Cad Cam is my passion within dentistry and whilst I understand your viewpoint I guess it depends what the job is. For our needs we place a lot of single visit restorations. As a consequence cerec / inlab is the only tool for the job within my particular situation. Going forwards we recently employed a CDT to work in house for bridgework production. The ability to stack mill and then mill superstructures in emax has enabled one lab tech (of 16 years experience) produce more units than he could with 4 staff historically. Whilst I realise this model may not work in all commercial lab situations for our own needs it is working well. Hope this helps. j [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
Anyone Milling Emax/Origin machine
Top
Bottom