Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
3Shape vs. Exocad
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="primus" data-source="post: 132990" data-attributes="member: 9090"><p>Tyler, Luke, and all others....</p><p></p><p>Sorry for my biased attitude.</p><p></p><p>Here is a little more info.</p><p></p><p>First time around, employee did a GREAT job, but took almost 6 minutes.</p><p></p><p>I told her to make it a 4 minute video....and she make One in around 2 minutes, and I guess Luke did not like it?</p><p></p><p>This threas was all about speed, no? If you want to see a beautiful crown, then my employees usually take around 4-6 minutes.</p><p></p><p>I earlier said Two, and I was wrong for real-world designing...My bad!</p><p></p><p></p><p>It all just depends on your own lab's preference as to how anal you want to get.</p><p></p><p>Both software do the same damn thing. Honestly, I think the Medit Blue and exocad have better margin recognition that rarely needs tweeking.</p><p></p><p>The initial proposal is now much better with exocad and closer to what you might want. All the tools are there, just different to use than 3shape.</p><p></p><p>There is only a few things that 3shape does that exo cannot, and vice/versa....I am sure they will both continue to add features. </p><p></p><p>The Medit scanners are super fast, and very few data voids compared to many other scanners. </p><p></p><p>I just don't see many people complaining about exocad, or the Medit....(OK same with 3shape?)</p><p></p><p>We can go back to the discussion of cost? </p><p></p><p>Medit and exocad = 1/2 the cost of a 3shape! But who cares about money, right? LOL</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="primus, post: 132990, member: 9090"] Tyler, Luke, and all others.... Sorry for my biased attitude. Here is a little more info. First time around, employee did a GREAT job, but took almost 6 minutes. I told her to make it a 4 minute video....and she make One in around 2 minutes, and I guess Luke did not like it? This threas was all about speed, no? If you want to see a beautiful crown, then my employees usually take around 4-6 minutes. I earlier said Two, and I was wrong for real-world designing...My bad! It all just depends on your own lab's preference as to how anal you want to get. Both software do the same damn thing. Honestly, I think the Medit Blue and exocad have better margin recognition that rarely needs tweeking. The initial proposal is now much better with exocad and closer to what you might want. All the tools are there, just different to use than 3shape. There is only a few things that 3shape does that exo cannot, and vice/versa....I am sure they will both continue to add features. The Medit scanners are super fast, and very few data voids compared to many other scanners. I just don't see many people complaining about exocad, or the Medit....(OK same with 3shape?) We can go back to the discussion of cost? Medit and exocad = 1/2 the cost of a 3shape! But who cares about money, right? LOL [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
3Shape vs. Exocad
Top
Bottom