Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
What is the most aesthetic, closest to natural dentition zirconia out there?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="charles007" data-source="post: 209226" data-attributes="member: 9"><p>After trying a lot of the more popular zirconia's over the past 5 years I found Jensens XT and Imagine to be the most dependable in shading</p><p>and translucency than anything else I've used. Zenostar and Dental Direkt BioZ run a close second place to XT with labs using good coloring techniques.</p><p>There is a new zirconia 600 type I thought look nicer than anything I've yet to see but the shading was not consistent and its harder to color. It rivals Emax MT</p><p>and would probably fool really good techs into thinking its Emax in their hands.</p><p>Very interested in trying the new Zenostar MT. If anyone is getting good shades with MT, please shoot me a PM, even if you don't want to mill for me off my stl's </p><p></p><p>As John said using different words, getting great shading and translucency is depended on the labs devotion to learn how to color correctly. Anyone with a mill</p><p>can color, but few labs are willing to learn how to color correctly within their own production quota's.............. Unfortunately the all mighty shrinking lab prices rules labs</p><p>to poor shading.</p><p>If pfms were banned today, most labs would be forced to spend the extra time to learn how to improve shades using zirconia. Maybe that Fools-Gold to think that. lol</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="charles007, post: 209226, member: 9"] After trying a lot of the more popular zirconia's over the past 5 years I found Jensens XT and Imagine to be the most dependable in shading and translucency than anything else I've used. Zenostar and Dental Direkt BioZ run a close second place to XT with labs using good coloring techniques. There is a new zirconia 600 type I thought look nicer than anything I've yet to see but the shading was not consistent and its harder to color. It rivals Emax MT and would probably fool really good techs into thinking its Emax in their hands. Very interested in trying the new Zenostar MT. If anyone is getting good shades with MT, please shoot me a PM, even if you don't want to mill for me off my stl's As John said using different words, getting great shading and translucency is depended on the labs devotion to learn how to color correctly. Anyone with a mill can color, but few labs are willing to learn how to color correctly within their own production quota's.............. Unfortunately the all mighty shrinking lab prices rules labs to poor shading. If pfms were banned today, most labs would be forced to spend the extra time to learn how to improve shades using zirconia. Maybe that Fools-Gold to think that. lol [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
What is the most aesthetic, closest to natural dentition zirconia out there?
Top
Bottom