TheLabGuy
Just a Member
Full Member
- Messages
- 6,246
- Reaction score
- 817
Brother Charles...I hear ya man!!!
Why use another alloy that will eventually leave a black line at the margins, and maybe even darker lines ?
Some doctors are switching to all ceramic to get away from future black margin and seeing opaque on day one.....and looking for cheaper fixed prices
So, my question is......Why go there with another pfm alloy on your menu.... unless your accounts are asking for titanium....
Hi K2. What is the heat rate (min/C) on a PFT bridge you are using? thanks
Why would you get a black margin if you have cut the metal back, also black areas around the neck are due to bio problems even high gold can have a tissue reaction but not with titanium it is the perfect metal for the patient, no tissue reaction no dark margins as long as you opaque it well. I really like Zr and emax but if a client wants a pfm crown why use high cost gold or nasty np when Ti is does the job and is far kinder to the patient!
The new insurance code puts the reimbursement of Titanium metal between noble and high noble PFM's. Milled Titanium should be the answer to everyone who hates base metals, doesn't want to use base metals, and is sick of putting crap metal in people's mouths.
If I'm not mistaken, all alloys have oxides, and grow darker over time. If Ti is different, please correct me.
Hmmm, considering I have a dental office with six dentists right here, I asked our billing department what the reimbursement is for PFT exactly.
Our computer does not even list PORCELIAN fused to titanium, but rather #2794 TITANIUM CROWN.
Our reimbursement is $585, vs $767 for porcelain to SP. Of course that number will vary from plan to plan, and we don't take the crappy ones here. I'm still not seeing the economics of this.
I imagine it's not in the CDT book yet Mark, I know it was brand new and I'll look it up again. It was in one of the publications I read recently being released by the ADA, a Titanium PFM and the reimbursement was in between noble and high noble. I'll dig around and find it.
The ADA doesn't set fees. Their CDT publication means nothing. They are the NADL for dentists.
.I'm not sure if this is where I read it but this is off B&D's website HERE
Whenever I read something like this, I have to ask myself, "What does B&D have to gain from this?" I know those guys and I like them, but they are the ones selling it, so I do take that into consideration...
"Perfect Replacement for Noble or High-noble Metal
With gold price ever-increasing, Titanium can be a perfect replacement for noble or even hi-noble metal. The ADA Council on Scientific Affairs has recently classified titanium between noble and high-noble alloys. Because of this new classification, dentists may now charge insurance companies between noble and high-noble rates using ADA Code D2794."
Once again Rob, just because the ADA made up a new code, and put it in the line between noble and high noble, doesn't mean much. Hell, the dentist can charge the insurance company $100,000 for Porcelain Fused to Unobtainium, but it doesn't mean the insurance company will actually pay for it.....
And we ALL know how the insurance companies just love their patients and will always pay for the MORE for a better material.
.Mark, we are not disagreeing here....
I know that Rob. I'm just clarifying, or trying to clarify for those people who may not know what we are talking about. I get calls from lab owners all the time, and some people don't understand what the CDT's are, and what they do.
I know the ADA can come up with any code they want and it's up to the insurance company to reimburse or not too, they have the say one way or another. The thing here though is that now their is a code to point to.
"The code has been designated as the national standard for reporting dental services by the federal government"
Once any new material or procedure becomes accepted and standard, there has to be some accpeted way to communicate what is being done to the patient. We can't have every Tom, **** and Harry making up their own terminlogy, nor will the insurance companies tolerate a dentist call stuffing residual bone chips into a socket and billing for a graft.
I just see this claim that you can arbitrarily bill between noble and high noble as nonsense.
I've gotten way off topic on this. I'm sorry.
.I have been very hesitant to even consider offering this product because of all the years of you bashing the hell out of it.
Actually, I LOVE the material. When I "bash" it, I'm really just objecting to the technicalities of the stuff. Maybe if i had a smaller lab, and I could manage all of these things, it would be a better fit for me, but the kind of lab I own, and the way I run my business is such that I don't like materials that are technique sensitive, and I don't like things I can't measure to see that they are working as planned.
I know you have a lot of experience trying to make CASTED material work but not sure how much milled experience you have had.
Casting the material was only part of the challenge back in the day. Getting reliable control of oxidation, and dealing with the reactivity of the metal was another. Titanium doesn't like high temperatures and until we make a light cured porcelain, I don't see any way to avoid heating it up.
How we got to the coping stage is immaterial to how it behaves once you raise the temperature.
With that being said, we have been working with the Nobels milled Ti with GC's porc on non real world cases to get a feel for the material, and I have to say the stuff has worked great. We will be rolling out this product as another cost effective "CLEAN" option compared to base metal this next month.
Good luck with that. I remember you saying you were going to "roll it out" last year, and I've heard the same thing from a lot of other people, but it just never seems to happen. One of the labs who is supposedly doing a "ton" of it, was here in November to look at my BruxZir mill and he said they've done less than 100 units.
Funny how stories grow as they get retold.
Truthfully I don't see it being a very big product for us as EMAX and ZI keep growing.
We have dropped several products this year, and Captek is currently on the examination table, and under consideration for the ax. I'm no longer adding any new products unless they are going to make a CONSIDERABLE contribution to sales or the bottom line (hopefully both) and we are scaling back our R&D activities.
I'm getting too old to sort out other peoples problems, and as long as there are alternatives that are proven and easy to work with, things like titanium just aren't going to make the cut here.