zero_zero
Well-Known Member
Full Member
- Messages
- 6,301
- Reaction score
- 1,397
Same here...I'd rather sip beer at the beach than slave away at the bench...the only future I see for me is trying to find a way out of this business.
Same here...I'd rather sip beer at the beach than slave away at the bench...the only future I see for me is trying to find a way out of this business.
Same here...I'd rather sip beer at the beach than slave away at the bench...
There is if you're willing to adjust/keep adding to your skillset. For the guy sitting at the bench waxing setups all day, there isn't much future. But the writing is on the walls. If you refuse to read it and adapt, it's your own fault. We are longer than most people in this industry think from full automation.We wont even be talking about these little toy printers in a few years.. Drs will be doing it themselves. Does anyone really think there is much future left to this industry? View attachment 27271
My problem is, that corporations are dumping millions into finding ways, to make you and I irrelevant. Not only technicians, but I believe dentists also. I disagree that it is a highly complex industry, the industry is being consolidated and a very few well-positioned companies will be doing everything directly for the dentist and ultimately the patient with expensive technology that most will not have access to. CHL, what would you consider 'tons of life left'? I have over 30 years until I retire, theres no way dentistry is done the same way in even 10 years. No caries, no crowns.
"
CRISPR is a ground-breaking genome editing method offered by Mother Nature itself. Researchers discovered its immense potential recently. I dealt with the story of the CRISPR/Cas9 system or the bacterial-derived RNA-directed endonuclease that generates blunt ends here. I also mentioned that it might become the ultimate weapon against cancer or help design babies in the future.
So what could CRISPR achieve in dentistry? Roland W. Hansen paediatric dentist believes that it might only be a matter of time that dentistry will be able to identify the causative genes in many oral pathologies. If research laboratory can tell us which genes are at fault for a specific disorder, we may find that in the near future a CRISPR solution to the fault can revise the genetic structure of the genome…a thought that was inconceivable until just recently."
we are finding cures to diseases sure, but have they eradicated disease? no and far from it.
in the same way crispr editing MIGHT eliminate some patients prone to caries but its not going to eliminate the entire sugar industry, poor hygiene, violent sport, or corrupt dental professionals who will cut healthy patients looking to get that hollywood smile.
it was decades before enough people and businesses bought cars before the horse industry died.
ive heard that by 2030 it is predicted there will be over 1billion fully edentulous people.
so...
We've found many many treatments, but I think I'd have to challenge the idea we've cured any disease in this century. Or even in the last 40 years. Cured people don't keep paying for meds, while those under the symptom management methodology of treatment frequently found in use do continue to buy meds, take blood tests, pay MDs, create the need for FNPs and PAs to be common, etc. etc.
Holy logic and spelling issues, Batman.i realize that may come off slightly conspiratorial. but i'm not nearly as tinfoil hat as this guy
apparently even dental caries are a result of computer.
Got one for you. The UN gave out innoculations against lockjaw to African women. Only women. Turns out that none of them who received the vaccine could carry a baby to term afterwards. All (13 ? I think) of the places they contracted to produce the massive amounts they wanted accidentally also added a component that caused fetal death and spontaneous abortion before the end of the second trimester.https://powerusa.org/2012/12/27/two-companies-have-effective-100-cure/ there are cures. but cured people as you say, dont keep paying for meds.
hep c is but one example. there are cures out there for juvenile diabetes, AIDS, and some forms of cancer. we'eve even recently discovered (as a collective) how medical systems around the globe have been giving out placebos in chemo treatments, issuing watered down drugs, or just plain overcharging trying to milk cancer patients till they moo.
how can a political system make medical promises and win votes if it is a system that is already efficient and up to date? if you had a universal health care system that worked to cure people, gave timely service, and was not eating up public money what political promises could be made? what lobbying would exist?
the reality is sick people keep healthy people employed. sick people create a need for science; to give the drug giants a reason to make a slightly better pill at a slightly reduced rate while they laugh all the way to the bank. but its not just drug companies either, theres a reason many hospitals have 'cancer wards' or other ways to segregate by disease.
bottom line here is the science - not drug company science - has found the cures, but its not good politics to dole out the cure. because theres a lot of money involved and people would rather be rich than well. something something sick soul.