Semi Precious Alloy for GC MC

J

jms804

Active Member
Full Member
Messages
66
Reaction score
28
Have always used high noble metals with MC. Have a client that I give a flat fee for singles, so thinking about using a semi precious on those crowns. Any suggestions?

Thanks
 
2thm8kr

2thm8kr

Beanosavedmysociallife
Full Member
Messages
11,304
Reaction score
2,510
Argen 51SF if you are casting. Palladium based, but no margin creep.
 
C

charles007

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
3,897
Reaction score
453
Jensen has a problem free Noble alloy called Superior, 60 Pd/25 Ag and I've used for years without any checking or discoloring..
Argen has a comparable alloy Argelite 61, 61Pd /28 Ag. Both alloys work well and have a medium light oxide.

You asked for advice ! The dumbest thing I ever did in the lab is sell pfms thinking its ok to use Noble alloy and bill out at Flat Rate pricing.
Only the dental business would think its ok buying high priced Noble precious alloys and selling flat rate makes good business sense. At this time Pd is very high and slim chance of dropping $200./$300. If you start selling at flat rate and Pd increases or decreases its hard to continuely change your prices every time you order alloy. All doctors expect HN pfms to be billed by weight and current Au/Pd market price. Your account will see lower alloy prices using Noble alloys, aprox $300.00 less per ounce than HN at current market price, plus Noble alloys have lower Density, less weight, so stress that to your doctor.
Last time I ordered Superior months ago I think the price was around $735.00 or so plus shipping. Markup your alloy at 50% to 75% for your investment like everyone else does. Btw, its going to cost you more casting Noble using more investment, separate finishing tools, etc for this one account, so keep that in mind if your dead set at pricing flat rate.
 
Last edited:
doug

doug

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
2,659
Reaction score
375
You can always outsource to Argen and get their Cr/Co/Pd alloy SLM. Works well and meets the requirement for a Noble alloy.
 
C

charles007

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
3,897
Reaction score
453
You can always outsource to Argen and get their Cr/Co/Pd alloy SLM. Works well and meets the requirement for a Noble alloy.
Doug, or anyone, sometimes I use Argens DPM with their Argelite 61 and HN Euro, but mostly DPM on full gold crowns. Fits are not that great, marginal fits, as compared to waxing inhouse. Yet to try SLM, are the fits any better than their DPM ?
 
Last edited:
doug

doug

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
2,659
Reaction score
375
I usually spend a little time on the margins since I don't want any problems at delivery, but I've been happy to this point.
 
R

Rick Sonntag

Active Member
Full Member
Messages
229
Reaction score
54
Have always used high noble metals with MC. Have a client that I give a flat fee for singles, so thinking about using a semi precious on those crowns. Any suggestions?

Thanks

If you can lock him into a price that's profitable for you now at record high palladium prices and the spot price falls, it's a great idea. But, if the uptrend continues you'll be paying for privilege of working for this client. Do your homework.
Screen Shot 2018-03-31 at 12.23.17 PM.png
 
RDA

RDA

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
947
Reaction score
192
Doug, or anyone, sometimes I use Argens DPM with their Argelite 61 and HN Euro, but mostly DPM on full gold crowns. Fits are not that great, marginal fits, as compared to waxing inhouse. Yet to try SLM, are the fits any better than their DPM ?
I agree with your comments on Argen's DPM fits and marginal fit. They can be good, but not great. I have tried Argen's SLM using the same alloy as I did with the DPM, and the DPM came out better for me. I sent the SLM back for credit, as I could not even use it.
 
sidesh0wb0b

sidesh0wb0b

Well-Known Member
Donator
Full Member
Messages
5,656
Reaction score
649
Argen 51SF if you are casting. Palladium based, but no margin creep.
i agree except isnt the 51SF considered high noble? i stick with the Argen 35SF, same palladium based with no margin creep. and silver free
 
2thm8kr

2thm8kr

Beanosavedmysociallife
Full Member
Messages
11,304
Reaction score
2,510
i agree except isnt the 51SF considered high noble? i stick with the Argen 35SF, same palladium based with no margin creep. and silver free
Probably, I haven't used casting alloy in years.
 
sidesh0wb0b

sidesh0wb0b

Well-Known Member
Donator
Full Member
Messages
5,656
Reaction score
649
Probably, I haven't used casting alloy in years.
the only down side with those SF alloys is the dark oxide layer. doesnt bother me most times but every now and then on bright bleach PFMs it can be troublesome.
still hand casting all alloys here....which totals maybe one casting a week haha.
 
doug

doug

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
2,659
Reaction score
375
Except of a metal frame to help reinforce a temporary bridge we haven't cast in almost 3 years. At this point I find my time is better spent having a cup of coffee.
 
2thm8kr

2thm8kr

Beanosavedmysociallife
Full Member
Messages
11,304
Reaction score
2,510
the only down side with those SF alloys is the dark oxide layer. doesnt bother me most times but every now and then on bright bleach PFMs it can be troublesome.
still hand casting all alloys here....which totals maybe one casting a week haha.
I always blasted the oxide off before a powder opaque wash bake and then two paste firings.

I used to spend a whole day under a scope finishing my metal work for the week. Usually Tuesday. Glad I don't do metal anymore.
 
C

charles007

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
3,897
Reaction score
453
I never liked high Pd alloys because of extra Pd cost and mainly because of the dark oxides that tend to show their face with a dark line around the margins and anywhere else you don't get excellent opaque coverage. Here's a tip for high Pd alloy users and light shades. Spray on white opaque modifier as your bonding coat. Its a great time saver if your opaquing a group of crowns and worth the extra time to hide the black line on pfms. If your not using a dark oxide alloy spray on opaque A1 or 50/50 white and A1 as your bonding coat. After being an almost all ceramic lab for years and rarely doing pfms, that black line around the margins seems darker now. Plus porcelain shoulder margins are obsolete now, at least in my lab. Its well worth the time to invest in a spray opaquer if you never used one and still doing pfms. ;)
 
TheLabGuy

TheLabGuy

Just a Member
Full Member
Messages
6,245
Reaction score
817
Argens Argelite 61 is what we use with our GC MC, never had an issue :)
 
C

charles007

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
3,897
Reaction score
453
Argens Argelite 61 is what we use with our GC MC, never had an issue m

Me to Rob, used Argelite 61 for over 30 years, and even on Vita porcelain and never had problems. The CTE works for so many porcelains systems.
 
Top Bottom