A
Acrylicwookie
Member
Full Member
- Messages
- 50
- Reaction score
- 2
Yep. Useless - in most cases. Just as there are ****ty dentists, I'm sure there are ****ty denturists. But that is why we have state boards to investigate complaints and weed out those who really don't know what they are doing. Arizona's supervision laws are the result of some very powerful ADA lobbyists. Giving denturists something without really giving them something. My sister was a senator in AZ and did some poking around about changing it and said it just aint happening. I think the future of any new state getting real denturism will need to look like Oregon's path - a citizen led initiative demanding a separate state board. Otherwise, leaving it to the state dental board will always look just like Arizona - dentist overreach. The state dental boards will always have more dentist ratio to "others" on their boards to keep control of what happens. And according to them, denturists are a danger to the publicThanks for the info, I had never heard that.. seems to contradict the point, but not necessarily a bad idea. What is the incentive to the denturist? Youre basically an employee of the dentist.
