What you really wanna see is the point cloud of the model if you have these two files in STL??
Download a 30day trial of geomagic qualify and shove em through that and you can measure the point spacing, then we can REALLY tell what one is more detailed.
ID love to see the results.
Here is some images from Sirona craplab of a typical scan.
Axial wall = spaces over 300um
Marginal area = ranged from about 80um to over 150um
This does not represent the point accuracy, but it tells us how much arbitary data is between the points that make up the model mesh (which our restorations are calculated from)
And there was me wondering why nothing fits with the peice of junk
This is how i understand it, if im wrong then someone please correct me.
Thanks to Pete (K2 ceramics) and ***'s posts for pointing me in the right direction with this. :hail: