Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
not easy to explain. or understand.. or accept...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CoolHandLuke" data-source="post: 81261" data-attributes="member: 4850"><p>thank you for fixing the link.</p><p></p><p>lets skip the abstract and get to the 4 points in this pdf that are worthy of notation. </p><p></p><p>1. The bond strength of group 1 (control) was similar to groups 3 and 5. this means the bond strength of a PFM was similar to the bond strength of a properly manufactured ZirPress, zirconia core zirliner'd.</p><p></p><p>2. No significant differences were found in regard to zirconia and control group.</p><p></p><p>3. the entire conclusions section. let me quote it. </p><p></p><p>4. based on 1 and 2 which were from the opening paragraphs, how can any of the conclusions even be made? we went from PFM and Zirconia having similar characteristics, to Zirconia and silica have weak unions.</p><p></p><p>this means the entire study is either a fabrication, or was not edited properly to form proper conclusions. there is no way you can ask any of us to respect this study it is not demonstrating conclusions with consistency and i have a feeling you werent paying attention when reading it, and skipped to the conclusions.</p><p></p><p>edited to add: why is Elliot Mechanic important?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CoolHandLuke, post: 81261, member: 4850"] thank you for fixing the link. lets skip the abstract and get to the 4 points in this pdf that are worthy of notation. 1. The bond strength of group 1 (control) was similar to groups 3 and 5. this means the bond strength of a PFM was similar to the bond strength of a properly manufactured ZirPress, zirconia core zirliner'd. 2. No significant differences were found in regard to zirconia and control group. 3. the entire conclusions section. let me quote it. 4. based on 1 and 2 which were from the opening paragraphs, how can any of the conclusions even be made? we went from PFM and Zirconia having similar characteristics, to Zirconia and silica have weak unions. this means the entire study is either a fabrication, or was not edited properly to form proper conclusions. there is no way you can ask any of us to respect this study it is not demonstrating conclusions with consistency and i have a feeling you werent paying attention when reading it, and skipped to the conclusions. edited to add: why is Elliot Mechanic important? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Zirconium
not easy to explain. or understand.. or accept...
Top
Bottom