Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAM
Milling/printing bite splints -thoughts?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LuthorCorp" data-source="post: 348932" data-attributes="member: 17611"><p>So for hard splints we use a completely different resin, and we do very few of these. The vast majority of our splints are the Keysplint Soft, because its so much similar to ClearSplint so all our customers prefer it. Hard printed splints need a very specific design as the inflexible nature really points out poorly blocked out designs.</p><p></p><p>As for models we take any intra oral scan and print models to articulate prior to designing the splint. We ran tests with the "Modeless" design, and it does work but to handle the more specific requests from clients, nothing beats the physical touch for final adjustments. So we print a set of models, articulate it on our calibrated articulator and then scan them back in for design.</p><p></p><p>This is basically only for functional ramp finalization, we have everything else dialed in to the point that it requires very little adjustment but we have limitations of the software that doesn't accommodate all requests so in some cases we need to adjust it manually anyways.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LuthorCorp, post: 348932, member: 17611"] So for hard splints we use a completely different resin, and we do very few of these. The vast majority of our splints are the Keysplint Soft, because its so much similar to ClearSplint so all our customers prefer it. Hard printed splints need a very specific design as the inflexible nature really points out poorly blocked out designs. As for models we take any intra oral scan and print models to articulate prior to designing the splint. We ran tests with the "Modeless" design, and it does work but to handle the more specific requests from clients, nothing beats the physical touch for final adjustments. So we print a set of models, articulate it on our calibrated articulator and then scan them back in for design. This is basically only for functional ramp finalization, we have everything else dialed in to the point that it requires very little adjustment but we have limitations of the software that doesn't accommodate all requests so in some cases we need to adjust it manually anyways. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAM
Milling/printing bite splints -thoughts?
Top
Bottom