Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAM
Milling Machines
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zirconia Wizard" data-source="post: 331461" data-attributes="member: 23046"><p>Why wouldn't you just get another Coritec 350i pro with loader? I have two coritec. One 350i loader and 350i pro + with loader. I am capable of running both mills from the same software just by clicking which machine to send the job to via millbox base software. They have been the most reliable machines I have ever used with fast, accurate mill times with quality secondary anatomy. Even the option to speed crn reducing time milled sacrificing secondary anatomy appearance however. </p><p>From my friends that use Roland type mills... They have been notorious for the long mill times with inaccurate mill finish time prediction results. Like vhf software its ballpark time instead of precise it seems. Even when Roland using sum3d/millbox combo software these problems still persist. </p><p></p><p>But like the other users above mentioned..... We have the tools but they are only as cable as the software deems it so.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zirconia Wizard, post: 331461, member: 23046"] Why wouldn't you just get another Coritec 350i pro with loader? I have two coritec. One 350i loader and 350i pro + with loader. I am capable of running both mills from the same software just by clicking which machine to send the job to via millbox base software. They have been the most reliable machines I have ever used with fast, accurate mill times with quality secondary anatomy. Even the option to speed crn reducing time milled sacrificing secondary anatomy appearance however. From my friends that use Roland type mills... They have been notorious for the long mill times with inaccurate mill finish time prediction results. Like vhf software its ballpark time instead of precise it seems. Even when Roland using sum3d/millbox combo software these problems still persist. But like the other users above mentioned..... We have the tools but they are only as cable as the software deems it so. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAM
Milling Machines
Top
Bottom