Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Metal
Let's talk Gold
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jcbdmd" data-source="post: 337039" data-attributes="member: 25113"><p>I still do probably 80% of my upper second molars in gold, and a surprisingly high percentage of lower seconds and even first molars in gold.</p><p></p><p>However, I must confess that I have usually "taken what the lab has given me" as long as it is a major vendor alloy and it is high noble with a decent percentage of actual gold for the warm yellow.</p><p></p><p>Apparently, I am very unscientific and "un-exacting" about my requirements for alloys, which is contrary to pretty much EVERYTHING else I do.</p><p></p><p>I think I was taught that a Type III is the safe choice, but I have notes from gold focused CE I have taken to look at the Argen 77 and Jensen JRVT 77 (R.V. Tucker... woot!) is best for anything under a short span bridge. Wouldn't those be Type II gold?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jcbdmd, post: 337039, member: 25113"] I still do probably 80% of my upper second molars in gold, and a surprisingly high percentage of lower seconds and even first molars in gold. However, I must confess that I have usually "taken what the lab has given me" as long as it is a major vendor alloy and it is high noble with a decent percentage of actual gold for the warm yellow. Apparently, I am very unscientific and "un-exacting" about my requirements for alloys, which is contrary to pretty much EVERYTHING else I do. I think I was taught that a Type III is the safe choice, but I have notes from gold focused CE I have taken to look at the Argen 77 and Jensen JRVT 77 (R.V. Tucker... woot!) is best for anything under a short span bridge. Wouldn't those be Type II gold? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who makes the popular shade guide?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Metal
Let's talk Gold
Top
Bottom