Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Articles
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
(Help!) Multi-Unit bridge issues.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="richgreen" data-source="post: 307181" data-attributes="member: 1232"><p>On a bridge this small it would seem unnecessary to place a sintering connector. However. one consideration could be, in this case, the abutments are thinner and have more surface and will cool faster than the pontic. A connector can help control the heat rate as the bridge heats and cools, thereby helping to control unwanted movement. I use a sintering connector on bridges like this that looks like a runner bar on a casting ( I know that ages me but, eh) And like Car54 mentioned perhaps a slower cooling rate might help</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="richgreen, post: 307181, member: 1232"] On a bridge this small it would seem unnecessary to place a sintering connector. However. one consideration could be, in this case, the abutments are thinner and have more surface and will cool faster than the pontic. A connector can help control the heat rate as the bridge heats and cools, thereby helping to control unwanted movement. I use a sintering connector on bridges like this that looks like a runner bar on a casting ( I know that ages me but, eh) And like Car54 mentioned perhaps a slower cooling rate might help [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who do we work for?
Post reply
Forums
Lab talk, the good, the bad, and the ugly
Dental-CAD
(Help!) Multi-Unit bridge issues.
Top
Bottom