Another new LDS…?

ps2thtec

ps2thtec

Well-Known Member
Donator
Full Member
Messages
2,494
Reaction score
620
Saw this in latest lmt, sagemax has a new PressCeramic. Hmmmm2

8F780C9C-9A20-4178-9DB7-6C6FE84C3060.png
 
Car 54

Car 54

Well-Known Member
Donator
Full Member
Messages
8,017
Reaction score
1,122
Not sure if memory serves me right, but wasn't Ivoclar who bought out Sagemax not too long ago ? Hmmmm2
Yes, to be able to offer a more competitive product price-wise compared to their, Ivoclar's zirconia lineup, especially as far as Prime$$
I also believe Sagemax is sold through other vendors, and not directly through Ivoclar.
 
Doris A

Doris A

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
5,112
Solutions
1
Reaction score
1,033
 
Car 54

Car 54

Well-Known Member
Donator
Full Member
Messages
8,017
Reaction score
1,122
Thank you for that link, Doris, as I could have sworn my rep said it was only sold through other vendors.

 
Car 54

Car 54

Well-Known Member
Donator
Full Member
Messages
8,017
Reaction score
1,122
I may be curious as far as the opal ingots.

sagemax.jpg

 
Toothman19

Toothman19

Active Member
Full Member
Messages
693
Reaction score
77
I'm looking forward to when I can print lithium disilicate. It's coming soon
 
Car 54

Car 54

Well-Known Member
Donator
Full Member
Messages
8,017
Reaction score
1,122
I'm looking forward to when I can print lithium disilicate. It's coming soon
...to a theater near you. At first, I laughed at that, but then realized it is the way things are heading. No more Platinium foil jackets, I'm getting tired of doing these :) :)

coming attractions.gif
 
doug

doug

Well-Known Member
Full Member
Messages
2,659
Reaction score
375
Design it in Exocad, send it to my LiSi printer? Nope, we don't do enough of it to justify the expense.
 
CoolHandLuke

CoolHandLuke

Idiot
Full Member
Messages
10,093
Solutions
1
Reaction score
1,411

currently only Zirc is offered or officially supported, however if you go to the Industry material you can see Alumina. IF (big if) they have used Alumina in that paper instead of Li Si clone, they'll conclude the study pretty quickly.
 
Toothman19

Toothman19

Active Member
Full Member
Messages
693
Reaction score
77

currently only Zirc is offered or officially supported, however if you go to the Industry material you can see Alumina. IF (big if) they have used Alumina in that paper instead of Li Si clone, they'll conclude the study pretty quickly.
I believe they have for lisi is just hasn't been peer reviewed yet. I'll try to find it
 
Toothman19

Toothman19

Active Member
Full Member
Messages
693
Reaction score
77
11:25 mark. I don't know how esthetic it looks yet or if it's cost effective yet...

 
CoolHandLuke

CoolHandLuke

Idiot
Full Member
Messages
10,093
Solutions
1
Reaction score
1,411
rewind to 5:26

this is a printing process that has been done in zirconia for a long time without wide adoption - for very good reason. its result is sh1t.

the zirc grains that have to grow and fuse to neighboring grains don't have good success because of the packing desnity of the grains. in pucks the material is compacted so well that the grains have no choice but to fuse during sinter, with "debrided" or burnt-out loosely printed grains theres easily areas that are not a strong enough bond, or to put it another way you can successfuly print, but come to find out a massive area of debridement has printed you a massive crack or gap; their strength test reports in the 10 minute mark show this very well. you lose easily half the strength of the zirconia printing this way, while still getting to "99.8% Theoretical density" which is misinformation at worst, misleading at best. when ALL the grains grow to crystals, you acheive theoretical density. 99.8% theoretical density does not infer its practically the same zirconia as comes from discs.

same bs that's been spewed by printer companies targeting dental or ceramics for ages.

its a dozen companies out there easily, selling slurry or even filament ceramic printing.
https://group-rs.com/en/prodotto/kuaiprint-zirconia-3d-printer/
https://3dceram.com/ceramique/zirconia/
even HS is trying to push it https://lmtmag.com/seminars/next-level-innovation-3d-printed-zirconia
https://www.prodways.com/en/material/plastcure-zirconia/
https://formlabs.com/materials/ceramics/

https://www.eazao.com/

and many more, this is just page 1 google.

every single one of these links is a ****ty old slurry or FILAMENT process that makes a sinterable part that has to be burnt out first, and which crumbles or breaks easily, or simply doesn't look good enugh to be useful as a dental product.

i always slag dental techs for being slow adopters, but when it comes to zirconia even the most cutting edge lab knows to stay the heck away from this bunk.
 
Toothman19

Toothman19

Active Member
Full Member
Messages
693
Reaction score
77
Oh I'm not even close to touching it, I was just trying to point out the process has started
 
Contraluz

Contraluz

Well-Known Member
Donator
Full Member
Messages
1,894
Reaction score
275
I may be curious as far as the opal ingots.
Ivoclar is selling these already. These were part of the original value ingots, which became the MT line up.

In case you are interested, I did an article about the value/opal ingots, a while ago:
 

Attachments

  • Article Reflect 3-2013.pdf
    13.3 MB · Views: 14
Car 54

Car 54

Well-Known Member
Donator
Full Member
Messages
8,017
Reaction score
1,122
Ivoclar is selling these already. These were part of the original value ingots, which became the MT line up.

In case you are interested, I did an article about the value/opal ingots, a while ago:
That's right, I forgot about that. And back to the Opals, I still have quite a bit of the Empress Esthetic ingots, as well as the layering porcelain sitting around collecting dust. I should probably list those on the forum.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Top Bottom