Search results

Yeah, I just checked doesnt work there. You could just set the scanned ti-base up as a regular crown prep, designe the top, then just subtract the bolt attachment through the designed crown top at the angled position you want. That's how I do it when I scan a ti-base or abutment..

Have you tried to angle it on a scanned abutment at the "scew chennel definition" stage? You can drag to an angle there.

Not sure if this works with scanned tibases, but this is the line for angled screw channels. If it's not there it could be added it to your settings.xml in the CADapp/config folder( at your own risk...save a copy of the original) ;) Or, you could ask your reseller to add it for you. It will show...

Yep, that’s an Encode healing cap!

No matter what the workflow, I insist on my clients using the Optisplint. I never let them scan the jig. I have them send it to me, then I scan it with my Medit T710. And, I always pour a patty model with the analogs to verify the fit. They can scan the scan caps and everything else. Even then...

I remember that, i think it was Lumineers… using Cerinate porcelain. As if it was the only porcelain you could make a veneer out of, lol!

Any time one of my clients calls me about an encode , I tell them to remove the encode and put in the scan body I’ve recommended. Any one that has a more accurate and consistent library… problem solved and you’ll have complete control of a successful outcome!

Great course! and nice seeing seeing you there!!

@vcapone OK.....so I had to come up with model + bar substructire working on a mostly full digital hybrid over a bar. So, in the ream of convoluted hacking this might work for you. I had to design a bar and then the hybrid over it without having a phisical model+bar to scan. In your case...

Sorry that didn't work. I understand, it's a PITA when you can't get things to work the way you want! Who is your Exocad reseller? Maybe they can try and change the parameters to help get what you want and not have any errors.

Yep, to edit the presets , right click

You could try editing the "modelditchdepthavg" max depth value in the defaultparameters .xml (in the CADAp config folder) to 5 and see if that helps to make it lower. This might only work using the default model parameters. If that doesn't work then try and the find Formlabs-3-B .xml and...

IMHO, It would be a lot easier if you would print a model with the libary sockets and put the analogs in it...

If you want to print models with the analog socket holes you’ll need to make them from the project designs that used scan markers and the model analog libraries that are related to them.

Un-check the “ditch around die” box. Then the model won’t have a ditch around it. Then just print the model stl ( unless you want to print the separate dies as well)

Are you designing this as a “digital waxup”? If you are, then after you design the gingiva and the waxup is calculated , you’ll have another “free form” step. Go to the”adapt” tab and hit “basal” button. It will adapt it to the tissue.

I don't make custom trays, A standard tray can work .. but I insist they modify it for an open tray technique.

Agree with Adam..Unless your doing photogrammetry, or the IOS user is REALLY good at scanning, then I mostly have them take a physical impression, then do the rest digital. I mean REALLY good at scanning or your looking a "rabbit hole!" ;)

Got them all as well! Been test driving them this past week. Excellent work Filippos!!

Brett, you can glaze the supragingival and get the look you prefer and just polish the tissue profile portion. I design all SR’s using tibases with the tissue emergence profile’s in polished ZI. ( the Tibase vs custom milled abutments is a whole other discussion ; ). IMHO, If you design them...